On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 15:43 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mike Gran writes:
>
> > guile.m4's serial number should be bumped for releases if it has changed.
>
> AFAICS there hasn't been any change recently. Did you spot something?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo'.
I think Andy had a change to th
Hi Ken,
On Tue 11 Aug 2009 15:59, Ken Raeburn writes:
> Perhaps I'm building [Guile] in ways that are unusual for the other
> developers (build dir != src dir, libgmp and guile-1.8 installed in
> the same place, libgmp and libunistring installed in different
> nonstandard directories)?
Yes, I t
On Tue 11 Aug 2009 16:45, Ken Raeburn writes:
> On Aug 11, 2009, at 09:59, Ken Raeburn wrote:
>> ERROR: In procedure make_objcode_by_mmap:
>> ERROR: bad header on object file: "GOOF-0.6-LE-4---"
>
> Ah, that was an old compiled file cached away in $HOME/.cache/
> guile/... that I needed to delete
On Aug 15, 2009, at 08:00, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hello,
We still have troubles with the `(scm_t_int32) (x) < 0' test in
`SCM_MAKE_CHAR ()':
--8<---cut here---start->8---
l...@gcc54:~/guile-1.9.1/+build$ cat ,,t.c
int
foo (unsigned char x)
{
return (((int)x)
Ken Raeburn writes:
> In the case of SCM_MAKE_CHAR, both actions give identical results for
> an input of 0, so I think just testing "x <= 0" will silence the
> warning without changing the behavior.
Oh, good point.
> There's always the inline-function approach, too.
Unfortunately no, because
On Aug 16, 2009, at 18:13, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
There's always the inline-function approach, too.
Unfortunately no, because we're still not assuming `inline' keyword
support from the compiler.
Right, but inline.h deals with that; if "inline" isn't supported you
just get a declaration and
Neil Jerram wrote:
>
> bornlibra23 writes:
>>In the same way, or differently? Please provide the relevant part of
>>the new build output.
> Regards,
> Neil
>
Hello Neil
I managed to find the code problem. It actually was not in the guile code.
One of the many libraries that I had ported over
