On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 16:40 -0700, Mike Gran wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I think I scared Ludo when I committed something, so let me try this
> instead. Attached please find the next patch toward Unicode strings. It
> is a big patch, but, it is the smallest patch I could make that added
> the next quantum o
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 02:44 -0700, Mike Gran wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 16:40 -0700, Mike Gran wrote:
> > Hi-
> >
> > I think I scared Ludo when I committed something, so let me try this
> > instead. Attached please find the next patch toward Unicode strings. It
> > is a big patch, but, it is
Hello!
Andy Wingo writes:
> Perhaps the deal is that 1+ is not being inlined. It seems to be calling
> out to the 1+ procedure, which is a primitive, actually making it a
> bit slower. I'll see what I can do.
Currently, invoking subrs conses, which is Bad(TM). Code that keeps
invoking `1+' and
Hi!
Andy Wingo writes:
> Dynamic-wind, on the other hand, does pose a problem. The problem is
> that dynamic-wind is a primitive -- to call it, the VM saves its
> registers, conses together its arguments, and passes them to the
> evaluator. The evaluator destructures the consed list, eventually