Andy Wingo wrote:
1) As you suggested, try doing some parts of this with new VM
operations. Like all of these in one op, or maybe just a "reference and
error on void" as one op, and/or "lookup the variable in some module,
and create it if not there" as another. I think we need some planning
to
Hi Andy,
thanks for the clarifications!
It's actually fairly simple, imo. Alpha-equivalence says that
(lexical-let ((x a)) x) is the same as (lexical-let ((y a)) y). (Note
that this lexical-let corresponds to Scheme's let.) So your program is
the same as:
(lexical-let ((y 2))
y ; -> 2
(fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Kraft wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your comments; I'm still a bit confused, though :$
>
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>>> What's about this:
>>>
>>> (defun test () a)
>>> (let ((a 1))
>>> (print a) ; 1
>>> (print (test)) ; 1
>>> (lexic
Hi Daniel,
On Fri 24 Jul 2009 09:08, Daniel Kraft writes:
>> It's actually fairly simple, imo. Alpha-equivalence says that
>> (lexical-let ((x a)) x) is the same as (lexical-let ((y a)) y). (Note
>> that this lexical-let corresponds to Scheme's let.) So your program is
>> the same as:
>>
>>> (le
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Waouh, it's a lot of work, and reviewing it takes some time, too.
> Honestly, I'd rather spend the small amount of time I spend on Guile
> these days in other areas with higher priorities.
Hehe; yes, it certainly is a `mixed blessing' to have so many
contr
