Ken Raeburn wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 15:48, Daniel Kraft wrote:
Especially, the question is about "what happens" when a lexical
variable is inside its scope again bound dynamically (say via let or a
lambda expression).
Oh, don't stop there... let's get some buffer-local or frame-local
bind
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
A slight modifications makes Guile (the one included
with fedora 11) crash:
[kje...@ttleon bin]$ guile
guile> (let ((j (lambda () 0))
... (k 0))
... (do ((i (j)
... (j))
...(l (lambda ()
... 1)
...
Hello Kjetil,
"Kjetil S. Matheussen" writes:
> Guile 1.8.0 segfaults as well.
>
> Here's the code ready for pasting:
>
> (let ((j (lambda () 0))
> (k 0))
> (do ((i (j) (j))
> (l (lambda () 1) (lambda () (+ i 1
> ((= i 3) k)
> (set! k (+ k i
>
> Sorry fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Kraft wrote:
> Ken Raeburn wrote:
>> On Jul 21, 2009, at 15:48, Daniel Kraft wrote:
>>> Especially, the question is about "what happens" when a lexical
>>> variable is inside its scope again bound dynamically (say via let or
>>> a lambda express
Ludovic Court?s:
Hello Kjetil,
"Kjetil S. Matheussen" writes:
Guile 1.8.0 segfaults as well.
Here's the code ready for pasting:
(let ((j (lambda () 0))
(k 0))
(do ((i (j) (j))
(l (lambda () 1) (lambda () (+ i 1
((= i 3) k)
(set! k (+ k i
Sorry
Hi Marijn,
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Guile also has lexical and dynamic variables; the fluids[1]. Queinnec in his
book LiSP also describes a system that has (default) lexical and dynamic
variable, on page 44. In both cases to find the value of a non-default variable
a function is used. Tran
On Jul 22, 2009, at 05:11, Daniel Kraft wrote:
It seemed really hard to me to find at least *basic* information
about how the lexbind things works; I did build now an emacs with
lexbind from trunk, but so far as I see this is not meant to
implement "lexical-let" as the cl package does, but r
On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:08, Julian Graham wrote:
Are there any active Guile hackers in Cambridge, MA? That could be a
better choice for a US location.
Define "active". :-)
Not so much on Guile itself, but my Guile-Emacs project is coming
along...
Ken
Andy Wingo writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I've finished up my refactor of Guile's arrays. To my eye it's much
> nicer now.
Yes, to me too. But I have two overall questions in mind.
- What do you have in mind as regards releasing this? Even though it
looks good, I think it would be better to let it m
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello!
>
> Neil Jerram writes:
>
>>> Perhaps we should set up a GNU Guile Hackers Meeting (G²HM) by the time
>>> 2.0 is released?
>>
>> If it works for everyone, why not?
>
> To make things more concrete, how about August 22--23? It works for
> Andy and m
10 matches
Mail list logo
