On Sun 05 Jul 2009 03:41, Mark H Weaver writes:
> Below is a proposal for how to make boolean tests and end-of-list
> tests faster and more compact, by renumbering the representations for
> SCM_ELISP_NIL, SCM_EOL, SCM_UNDEFINED, and SCM_EOF_VAL.
That looks like great work, Mark!!
I don't think
Hey folks :)
On Thu 18 Sep 2008 11:17, "Neil Jerram" writes:
> In my view, this part is still useful:
>
> "You must take care to always unreserve an array after reserving it,
> also in the presence of non-local exits. To simplify this, reserving
> and unreserving work like a dynwind context (see
Hello,
Andy Wingo writes:
> I'm hacking on this code right now, and have come to think that
> scm_array_handle_release is superfluous. It shouldn't protect against
> concurrent modification of the data, as that should be done with
> user-implemented mutexen. It obviously doesn't do anything now
I would like to argue that the definitions of scm_is_false,
scm_is_true, and scm_is_null should indeed be changed to test for
%nil.
Do a grep-find in the tree for uses of these macros. I think you'll
find that the majority of places where they are used should also be
checking for %nil, but they a
We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 1.8.7. This is the next
maintenance release for the 1.8 stable series. It provides a number of
portability improvements, bug fixes, as well as several new features.
The Guile web page is located at http://gnu.org/software/guile/, and
among other thing
