Hi Andy,
> Your solution of doing whole-program analysis is very much in the spirit
> of R6RS, but it is not in the spirit of Lisp, in my opinion at least.
Well, to be fair, it's not whole-program analysis -- as Neil pointed
out, we only need to analyze the library and program "headers." But,
su
Hello!
Julian Graham writes:
> It's a fine way of handling version-less dependencies, but I don't see
> how it solves the determinism issue. Let's say my program (or code
> stream or script or whatever you want to call it) uses libraries from
> two different authors. Author A trusts his depend
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Is this the right place and the right way to do such things? Comments?
Looks great to me - but I'm still a bit of a newbie at this compiler
malarkey.
Neil
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi!
>
> Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> "In addition to its manual, the package should have a file named
>> @file{NEWS} which contains a list of user-visible changes worth
>> mentioning. ..."
>>
>> So I'd say that use of Gnulib (in general) should not be a NEWS
Hello,
Neil Jerram writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> (I think we don't disagree on what `NEWS' should contain, but on whether
>> Gnulib qualifies as "user-visible".)
>
> I would certainly agree that individual portability fixes should be in
> NEWS. Is that what you have in mi
Hi all,
Daniel came up with an interesting test case:
scheme@(guile-user)> (if %nil 1 2)
1
We could fix this transparently by changing scm_is_false in boolean.h
from:
#define scm_is_false(x) scm_is_eq ((x), SCM_BOOL_F)
to
#define scm_is_false(x) (scm_is_eq ((x), SCM_BOOL_F) ||
Andy Wingo writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Daniel came up with an interesting test case:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (if %nil 1 2)
> 1
>
> We could fix this transparently by changing scm_is_false in boolean.h
> from:
>
> #define scm_is_false(x) scm_is_eq ((x), SCM_BOOL_F)
>
> to
>
> #define sc
Hello,
I'm finally looking into these new VM ops...
"Andy Wingo" writes:
> +#define BV_FIXABLE_INT_REF(stem, fn_stem, type, size) \
> +{ \
> + long i;
On Mon 29 Jun 2009 23:44, Neil Jerram writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> scheme@(guile-user)> (if %nil 1 2)
>> 1
>>
>> #define scm_is_false(x) (scm_is_eq ((x), SCM_BOOL_F) || SCM_NILP (x))
> Seems wrong to me. In Scheme #f should be the only false value.
> What's the argument for %n
