On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Sun 07 Jun 2009 19:08, Juhani Viheräkoski writes:
Guile trunk as of today seems does not build (I ran make distclean after
updating to latest version, this might explain if you do not get the
same error). This is what it chokes on, after the error m
Howdy good sir!
I've been taking a look at string_abstraction2 this evening. (Well, I
wrote that last evening. Time passes!) I'm really looking forward to it
going in. The concepts seem sound, but I think the branch could be even
better with a rebase. Further comments and impressions:
commit
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Tue 09 Jun 2009 20:47, Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> To generate the backtrace, I added the following lines near the top of
>> guile-tools. Is there a better way?
>>
>> (debug-enable 'debug)
>> (debug-enable 'backtrace)
>> (debug-set! depth 100)
>> (write (debug-opt
Mark H Weaver writes:
> I know I'm new here, but I'm sure we can all agree that Andy Wingo has
> earned a spot in the top section of the THANKS file.
Definitely!
> Who wants to do that?
Me, very shortly...
Neil
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Apologies for sending so many emails in so short a time, but I've put
> together the final pieces of this puzzle.
Fantastic puzzling!
With Andy's change to increase the default stack limit to 16,
`make check' passes for me now. I've also unblocked the overnight
snap
Andy Wingo writes:
> commit a462ad13abac7f12fa370fb1724a6eb7d80edcb2
> Author: Michael Gran
> Date: Mon May 18 07:50:21 2009 -0700
>
> string abstraction on charsets and combine redundant string_ref_to_XXX
>
> I still thing scm_i_string_ref should just return a wchar :) Reg
I'm glad to see the emacs-lisp work is progressing. As it happens, a
month or so ago I blew some of the dust off my old guile-emacs project
and started working on it again too. This flavor of emacs+guile work
aimed to replace Lisp objects in Emacs with Guile objects at the
lowest level (n
