git server broken?

2009-06-01 Thread Greg Troxel
My autobuild failed, and on checking: list gdt 12 ~/BUILD-GUILE-1.8/guile > git pull git.sv.gnu.org[0: 199.232.41.69]: errno=Connection refused fatal: unable to connect a socket (Connection refused) pgpMCBsYyRpJV.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: git server broken?

2009-06-01 Thread Mike Gran
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 07:15 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > My autobuild failed, and on checking: > > list gdt 12 ~/BUILD-GUILE-1.8/guile > git pull > git.sv.gnu.org[0: 199.232.41.69]: errno=Connection refused > fatal: unable to connect a socket (Connection refused) > Yeah, savannah was mostly dead.

Re: git server broken?

2009-06-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Greg, Greg Troxel writes: > list gdt 12 ~/BUILD-GUILE-1.8/guile > git pull > git.sv.gnu.org[0: 199.232.41.69]: errno=Connection refused > fatal: unable to connect a socket (Connection refused) Savannah was off-line for a while: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-06/msg0

Re: r6rs libraries, round two

2009-06-01 Thread Andy Wingo
Hey Julian, On Sun 31 May 2009 01:22, Neil Jerram writes: > Julian Graham writes: > >> 1. Add an optional `version' field to the module record type > > Sounds good. Agreed. >> * What's a good format here? We could mirror the requirements of R6RS >> here (i.e., (v1 v2 ...) where vx is a whole

Re: Publishing the manual...

2009-06-01 Thread Andy Wingo
On Sun 31 May 2009 02:11, Neil Jerram writes: > I should let you all know that Brian Gough has approached me about > publishing the Guile manual. How lovely! This is great news :-) > If you have any ideas about this, or would like to help out, or have > any concerns, please let me know. Consid

Re: Publishing the manual...

2009-06-01 Thread Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
Hi Neal. This sounds neat. I was thinking that, by the time the manual hits the bookshelves, Geiser will probably have matured to the point of having documentation: if you and/or the editors think it'd be worth it, count on me to contribute (or help with) a short chapter on Geiser (i'll understand

Re: r6rs libraries, round two

2009-06-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Andy Wingo writes: >>> * Should we establish some rules for what you get when you don't >>> specify a version? >> >> Yes! The latest available? > > I don't know. This is IMO a terrific part of version handling in R6 modules. What will it mean for a 2009 program to import `(rnrs base)'