Test suite coverage

Hello! I compiled and linked Guile `master' (as of cb9d473112ac172a3d328bb029b5b550918d4262, dated 2009-03-09) with `--coverage', then run "make check" and collected the results with lcov(1): http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/software/guile/coverage/ The test suite covers more than 70% of the API.

Re: Three small benefits of a new computer

Hey, On Sun 08 Mar 2009 19:45, Neil Jerram writes: > 1. It has a MIPS processor, so I'll be regularly building with that > now - which is good for a bit of non-Intel and big-endian variety. That's great! > 2. It's a bit slow... which is good for not forgetting about > performance. :-) Definit

Re: vm status update

On Sun 08 Mar 2009 23:40, Neil Jerram writes: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >>> Anyway, that's where I am. Bug-wise we still have a bug in backtraces, >>> which I need to pin down at some point, and update docs -- but generally >>> speaking we're mergeable. What do people think, shou

GC brokenness in `master'

Hello, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > ("subr.bm: subr invocation: simple subr" 70 total 0.98) > ("subr.bm: subr invocation: generic subr" 70 total 1.39) > ("subr.bm: subr invocation: generic subr with rest arg" 70 total 1.32) > ("subr.bm: subr invocation: gen

Re: Locks and threads

Neil Jerram writes: > next it's on to the real problem, threadsafe define. I've been running Linas's define-race test program, and hitting the `throw from within critical section' quite a lot. We've already discussed this a couple of times: http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-gu...@gnu.org/msg04613

Re: GC brokenness in `master'

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hello, > > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> ("subr.bm: subr invocation: simple subr" 70 total 0.98) >> ("subr.bm: subr invocation: generic subr" 70 total 1.39) >> ("subr.bm: subr invocation: generic subr with rest arg" 70