Re: BDW-GC-Guile incompatibilities

Hi Neil, Neil Jerram writes: > Sorry for my delay in following up here... Same for me! 1. The lack of `gc-live-object-stats'. > I was actually thinking of decrementing an object type counter when an > object is collected - and having looked more at the docs I see that > that would mean

Re: [VM] Tail recursion and multiple values

Hey Ludo! On Sat 28 Feb 2009 15:45, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Use of multiple values breaks tail recursion in VM-compiled code: >> >> (let loop ((x 100)) >> (and (> x 0) >> (call-with-values >> (lambda ()

Re: Putting an end to "compiled closures"

Hello! l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > The attached patch creates a new type tag, `scm_tc7_gsubr', whereby the > 24 MSBs are used to store gsubr arity information as returned by > `SCM_GSUBR_MAKTYPE ()'. This makes cclos useless, which simplifies the > code and reduces the overhead when

Re: [VM] Tail recursion and multiple values

Hello! Andy Wingo writes: > On Sat 28 Feb 2009 15:45, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> Actually no: it works with VM-compiled code, but it breaks when using >> Guile-VM with `,o interp #t' (which appears to be the default, except at >> the REPL). > > This is a misunderstanding. > > Las