Hi,
On Mon 17 Nov 2008 00:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> And I assume the actually loaded libguile was version 1.8.5? So there
>> should have been something in the library saying that it needed 1.8.3,
>> which would have caused the link to fail. Does the libtool scheme
>> co
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon 17 Nov 2008 15:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> Besides, as Linas noted, the hash table implementation isn't
>> thread-safe, which makes it "unsafe" to `define' in parallel.
>
> Ah, this is why, then. I was baffled.
>
> IMO this is
Hi,
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Beating a dead horse, 1.8.5 should be compatible with 1.8.3, via
> whatever mechanism. (The actual problem in this case was elsewhere.)
1.8.5 *is* compatible with 1.8.x.
> I am skeptical of pushing significant changes into stable branches. I
> really
