Hi Julian,
"Julian Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah, yes -- I remember those from five years ago, the first time I
> tried to add thread cancellation support to Guile. Find attached a
> patch that raises an error if `(srfi srfi-18)' is loaded when Guile
> has been built using --without-t
Hi Ludovic,
> Furthermore, I think `srfi-18.test' needs to be modified so that, when
> threads aren't available, it does not "(use-modules (srfi srfi-18))" so
> that we don't get the error.
>
> Can you fix that?
Ugh, sorry. One day I'll get the hang of git, I promise. In the
meantime, find att
Hey!
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>> That said, the ideal would be something like `add-change-log-entry' that
>> operates on Git logs instead of ChangeLogs, but there doesn't seem to be
>> anything like this. DVC is said to support things like that, b
Hi,
"Julian Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ugh, sorry. One day I'll get the hang of git, I promise. In the
> meantime, find attached a new version of the patch.
Thanks, pushed!
Ludo'.
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
> Hey!
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>
>>> That said, the ideal would be something like `add-change-log-entry' that
>>> operates on Git logs instead of ChangeLogs, but there doesn't seem to be
>>> anything like this. DV
Hello,
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The removal of the scm_i_* functions is an ABI break in the stable 1.8
> series. It should be reverted. (It's a great fix for master though.)
After discussion with Andy on IRC and looking for uses for `scm_i_' in
Google's codesearch, I've become co
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>> Then I guess I'm happy to abolish ChangeLogs. Two questions remain:
>>
>> 1. Should we remove ChangeLog files from the repo?
>> 2. Should we generate ChangeLogs for releases?
>>
>> I'd say "yes" to (1) and "no" to
2008/8/30 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>
>>> Then I guess I'm happy to abolish ChangeLogs. Two questions remain:
>>>
>>> 1. Should we remove ChangeLog files from the repo?
>>> 2. Should we generate ChangeLogs
2008/8/30 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Nevertheless, the change *will* appear in the next stable release.
Do you mean the next 1.8.x release, or the first 1.10.x release
(whenever that might occur)?
Regards,
Neil
Hi,
I'm trying to compile GUILE on a x86_64 machine, to figure out the GC problems
autoreconf: Entering directory `.'
autoreconf: configure.in: not using Gettext
autoreconf: running: aclocal --force -I guile-config -I m4
configure.in:815: warning: macro `AM_GNU_GETTEXT' not found in library
autor
Okay, I think I know what the problem is: Part of the SRFI-18 thread
start / creation process involves contention for a mutex, and there's
a bug in fat_mutex_lock code that causes the locking thread to
sometimes miss an unlocking thread's notification that a mutex is
available. So it's actually a
Julian Graham escreveu:
> Okay, I think I know what the problem is: Part of the SRFI-18 thread
> start / creation process involves contention for a mutex, and there's
> a bug in fat_mutex_lock code that causes the locking thread to
> sometimes miss an unlocking thread's notification that a mutex is
> Would this also explain the 'corruption' in the evaluator we have been
> seeing ("bad bindings at .. ")?
I don't think so; in fact, I just got one of those errors while
looping your test code. I think it's something else, unrelated to the
patch I just sent in. I'll keep looking at it. You ha
13 matches
Mail list logo
