2008/5/28 Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> After a closer look I believe the logic of the test is just plain wrong:
>
> aux (l) unsigned long l;
> { int x; exit (l >= ((unsigned long)&x)); }
> main () { int q; aux((unsigned long)&q); },
>
> The test returns true for a downward-growing stack,
Neil Jerram wrote:
> 2008/5/24 Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Neil Jerram wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe those definitions came from the Boehm GC library. Do you
> > happen
> > > to know whether similar improvements have already been applied to Boehm
> > GC?
> >
> > The development versio
On Saturday 24 May 2008 5:19 pm, Neil Jerram wrote:
> 2008/5/15 Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Not sure if you have noticed already. The build has failed on ia64 with
> > a segmentation fault. Here is the relevant log for ia64
> >
> >
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=guile-
Neil Jerram wrote:
> 2008/5/28 Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > After a closer look I believe the logic of the test is just plain wrong:
> >
> > aux (l) unsigned long l;
> > { int x; exit (l >= ((unsigned long)&x)); }
> > main () { int q; aux((unsigned long)&q); },
> >
> > The test return