Hi Julian,
"Julian Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All this kind of presumes that SRFI-18 is something that the Guile
> maintainers care about supporting. Is it? I'm afraid I don't know
> the Guile project's attitude towards implementing SRFIs.
I'm not sure there's an "official position"
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> * the heap gets more and more underutilized, although it seems to
> eventually stabilize somewhere around 5% (!) utilization (i.e.,
> total/alive = 20);
The main reason appears to be that the size of individual segments grows
exponentia
Hi Ludovic,
> Thus, you'd need to pinpoint what can be implemented without changing
> the core API (e.g., do the SRFI-18 type predicates really require
> changes in the core type predicates, or can they be implemented without
> changing the core API?), what requires changes/additions in the core
>
