Re: Post-reader changes benchmarks

Hi Andy, Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have re-run my benchmarks against the released Guile 1.8.2, Guile HEAD > before the reader changes, and Guile HEAD after the changes. Thanks! Good to see we're doing even slightly better than SCM. That 1.6 is significantly faster than 1.8 is

Re: Profile of current guile HEAD

Hey! Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Some more data points. I just profiled a run of guile -c 1 from HEAD. > This is what callgrind says about which functions are taking the most > time: > > cumulative self total > percentpercentcallsfile:function >23.15 19.30