Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> I tend to disagree.
>
> At the current release rate of GUILE, I'd expect anyone using GUILE
> seriously to run the CVS version. I do, at least.
The last time I looked, you could find the 1.4 series being released
with some BSD distributions. That means my stuff has t
Bruce Korb escreveu:
> By the way, have you all given any consideration to releasing a
> valgrind config file that would clean out valgrind chaff?
> I recently needed to do a valgrind run and it was quite painful.
I always use the file below. I am not sure what the best way to
distribute it would
Bruce Korb escreveu:
>> At the current release rate of GUILE, I'd expect anyone using GUILE
>> seriously to run the CVS version. I do, at least.
>
> The last time I looked, you could find the 1.4 series being released
> with some BSD distributions. That means my stuff has to run against
which
Hi Kevin,
I basically agree with most of your remarks. Here are some I don't
quite agree with or that deserve discussion.
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> +* i18n Introduction:: Introduction to Guile's i18n support.
>
> "i18n" is a horrible geek-ish abbreviation, much bette
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Bruce Korb escreveu:
>> By the way, have you all given any consideration to releasing a
>> valgrind config file that would clean out valgrind chaff?
>> I recently needed to do a valgrind run and it was quite painful.
>
> I always use the file below. I am not sure what th
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Well, as long as we keep 'supporting' the 1.4 interfaces, there is little
> incentive for developers to upgrade to the 1.6 or 1.8 API.
Let me be clear about this: it is (most likely) not the developers.
It is my clients. Some of them upgrade to bleeding edge Guile and
t
Bruce Korb escreveu:
> it chokes and dies on their system. I could, of course, incorporate
> the Guile library into my project, but I've determined that that is
> way, way, way over the top. If the interfaces are not stable enough
As a sidenote,
We incorporate a copy of the GUILE library in the
Bruce Korb escreveu:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> Bruce Korb escreveu:
>>> By the way, have you all given any consideration to releasing a
>>> valgrind config file that would clean out valgrind chaff?
>>> I recently needed to do a valgrind run and it was quite painful.
>> I always use the file belo
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
By the way, have you all given any consideration to releasing a
valgrind config file that would clean out valgrind chaff?
>>> I always use the file below. I am not sure what the best way to
>>> distribute it would be.
>> I think there are two reasonable ways:
>>
