Re: Eval options macro: backward compatibility?

Hi, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > this order is awkward when a new trap option has to be added. > > The problematic thing is that this is exported to GUILE users, through > > #define SCM_ENTER_FRAME_P scm_evaluator_trap_table[1].val > > in eval.h > > I would like to change

Re: [PATCH] experimental lookupcar based coverage testing.

Hi, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is now in CVS, along with a couple of other changes. Thanks! Just a minor note: Could you make sure you follow the GNU style for, e.g., comments [0]? One could argue it's poor man's coverage test since, unlike with `gcov', one cannot kno