Hi,
attached is a patch that seems to fix the problem with gcc4 and 64bit
architectures.
The scm_mark_locations function in gc-mark.c calls scm_gc_mark on
everything located in one of the allocated segments. Shouldn't there
be a check if the address is at least scm_t_cell aligned?
Is it correct
On 5/4/06, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Martin Kuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> thanks for the helpful pointers; guile-debugging, guile-vm and the
> compilation discussion all look quite interesting. The hobbit topic
> feels a little scary though, and I'm not sure I wa
On 5/2/06, Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To fetch it:
$ tla register-archive \
http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/software/arch-2004/
$ tla get [EMAIL PROTECTED]/guile-vm--revival--0.6 guile-vm
To summarize: the main issue left (and probably the main reason why
Keisuke Nishida ne
On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 00:02 +0200, Martin Kuehl wrote:
> Damn, macros again :-)
> I'll definitely take a look at the revival, but I really doubt I'm the
> one to take on first-class macros just yet. I seem to have a hard
> time reasoning about them instead of CL macros (or maybe I just
> confuse t
