Re: Removal of SCM_UNBOUND

2006-04-17 Thread Mikael Djurfeldt
On 4/16/06, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to check my understanding: I believe the existing SCM_UNBNDP > macro, which is used in C code to check for the presence of an > optional argument, expands to (x == SCM_UNDEFINED); I presume that > SCM_UNBOUND is a distinct value (and somewha

Re: 1.6.8 release candidate 1 available for testing.

2006-04-17 Thread Kevin Ryde
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm assuming that you might have just removed slib.test from SCM_TESTS > in Makefile.am, Yep, which keeps it out of the dist, though it still hurts from the cvs (I dithered about that then did nothing). I guess I could have commented out everything in