Hi,
About `scm_c_locale_string_to_number ()'...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> While writing it, it occurred to me that R5RS does not make it clear
> whether `string->number' converts from a number's external
> representation or not.
As discussed in [0], while R5RS does not expli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> Can someone comment on it or commit it?
Sound's reasonable, though I still don't know what "locale" is doing
in the name if it's only ascii which will work.
Should the name be scm_c_locale_stringn_to_number ?
^-
