Re: [PATCH] Fix for `make-autoload-interface'

Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I want to do a merge. > > Marius: what's the theory on all the copyright years? 2006 is in the > branch but not the head. On a somewhat related note, I asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] if the copyright notices have to be a single line, and I was told that they don

ice-9 format doesn't typecheck

Hello, ice-9 format is broken: muurbloem:/tmp$ guile --version Guile 1.7.2 .. guile> (use-modules (ice-9 format)) guile> (format #f "~$" "02.4738") "24.74" Can we have typechecking for the various ~ flags in format strings? Thanks! ___ Guile-de

[PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value'

Hi, The patch below documents the following "issue": ;; What you have in mind is that the `blurps' slot will always refer ;; to a new list. guile> (define-class () (blurps :init-value (list 0))) guile> (define c (make )) guile> (set-car! (slot-ref c 'blurps) 1) guile> (slo

[Neil Jerram] Re: undefined reference to `scm_init_guile'

Copying to the Guile list ... (Steven, please CC guile-devel@gnu.org on your future emails about this also.) --- Begin Message --- steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Jerram [2006-03-08, 08:50:56]: > >> We should fix test-num-integral so that it still builds in that case, >> of co

Re: mailing list moderation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: > It appears that this mailing list, [EMAIL PROTECTED], (among many others), > has no known owner/moderator, and accepts mail from non-subscribers. > The result is passing through of lots of spam. Karl, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is still live, and I (in my capacity

Re: undefined reference to `scm_init_guile'

Neil Jerram [2006-03-09, 22:35:34]: > >> We should fix test-num-integral so that it still builds in that case, > >> of course. Do you also need scm_init_guile for your own programs? > > > > no, I was just trying to upgrade the OpenBSD port for guile to version > > 1.8.0, and it would be cool if th

Re: undefined reference to `scm_init_guile'

steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Jerram [2006-03-09, 22:35:34]: >> >> Thanks. What is the Guile version of the existing OpenBSD port? > > it's 1.6.7. Thanks. >> (It's easy enough to fix the tests to use scm_with_guile instead, but >> I'm concerned that we've unintentionally r

Re: undefined reference to `scm_init_guile'

steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Jerram [2006-03-10, 22:10:39]: >> >> Digging a bit further, this looks like it's caused by >> HAVE_PTHREAD_ATTR_GETSTACK not being defined. Can you confirm that >> when you run ./configure, it says that pthread_attr_getstack can't be >> found? >

1.8 branch fails make check?

Is it just me, or is everyone getting this with the 1.8 CVS branch: Running unif.test ERROR: unif.test: make-shared-array: 2 dims from 1 dim - arguments: ((misc-error "make-shared-array" "mapping out of range" () #f)) ERROR: unif.test: make-shared-array: stride every third element - arguments: (

Re: 1.8 branch fails make check?

Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it just me, or is everyone getting this with the 1.8 CVS branch: > > Running unif.test > ERROR: unif.test: make-shared-array: 2 dims from 1 dim - arguments: > ((misc-error "make-shared-array" "mapping out of range" () #f)) > ERROR: unif.test: make-shar

Re: ice-9 format doesn't typecheck

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes: > > guile> (format #f "~$" "02.4738") > "24.74" I think it's supposed to be a feature that strings work for the floating point output. I put "number or number string" in the manual to show that. Though in this case it seems the output is wrong. :-(

Re: 1.8 branch fails make check?

Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If it's not just me, how can we have a released product which is > failing make check on GNU/Linux? I added those, from a report on bug-guile. They're real bugs, new in 1.8 and wanting attention from an expert in the shared array stuff. __

Re: [PATCH] Fix for `make-autoload-interface'

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > The fix below is simple but I think it's the right way to solve this. Sound fair. Thanks, I checked it in. I took the liberty of changing the test file to modules.test, and I made it use the "ice-9 q" module, to avoid the warning from srfi-19 repla

Re: undefined reference to `scm_init_guile'

Neil Jerram [2006-03-10, 22:10:39]: > steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Neil Jerram [2006-03-09, 22:35:34]: > >> > >> Thanks. What is the Guile version of the existing OpenBSD port? > > > > it's 1.6.7. > > Thanks. > > >> (It's easy enough to fix the tests to use scm_with_guile