Re: [PATCH] Inlining `scm_is_pair ()'

2006-01-29 Thread Marius Vollmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > The following patch makes `scm_is_pair ()' an inline [...] I just put scm_is_pair into inline.h, using our existing inlining machinery that should be portable enough. Ok? > I'm not sure that's the only reason, but I'm now unable to compile Guile > w

Re: Branching for 1.8 on 2006-02-05

2006-01-29 Thread Neil Jerram
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I need to kick myself to get going with the 1.8 release, and want to > do it by just branching for 1.8 soon and thus get out of the way of > the devlopment happening on the trunk. > > I want to branch next weekend, on Sunday, 5. Feb. Before tha

Re: API naming bugs

2006-01-29 Thread Marius Vollmer
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about renaming the internal scm_frame functions instead, since > AFAIK they haven't been released yet? Yep, I'll do that. > Perhaps scm_context_..., or scm_dynwind_..., or scm_dc_...? I'm going with scm_dynwind_ since the functions are directly rela

Re: Branching for 1.8 on 2006-02-05

2006-01-29 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >I need to kick myself to get going with the 1.8 release, and want to >do it by just branching for 1.8 soon and thus get out of the way of >the devlopment happening on the trunk. > >I want to branch next weekend, on S

Re: problem with futures?

2006-01-29 Thread Marius Vollmer
Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For now, I will not work further on that code. To the Guile > developers I suggest that you do what you want. Fix it, or back out > the future feature entirely. Hmm. Semantically, 'begin-thread' and 'thread-join' should be (nearly?) identical to '