Re: [PATCH] Accurate count of freed cells

Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > 2005-12-20 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * gc-card.c (scm_i_sweep_card): Only increment FREE_COUNT for > cells that were really freed. Can someone commit this and/or comment on it? Thanks, Ludovic. _

Re: [PATCH] Accurate count of freed cells

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> 2005-12-20 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> * gc-card.c (scm_i_sweep_card): Only increment FREE_COUNT for >> cells that were really freed. > >Can

Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi, > > Better late than never... ;-) Absolutely! > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Another (lesser) problem with lazy-catch and with-exception-handler is >> that they are always used in practice in a particular pattern. [...] > > OTOH,

Re: [PATCH] `try-module-autoload' and `current-reader'

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi, > > In `boot-9.scm', `try-module-autoload' should be using `load-module', > and not `primitive-load', when loading a non-compiled module. The > reasons are (i) non-autoloaded modules are loaded using `load-module' > and (ii) `load-module' and `pri