[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> For `current-reader' I think we should stick as we are.
>
> Then, should we go ahead and remove the `current-module' and
> `set-current-module' procedures in favor of `current-module' as a fluid?
> By not ex
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Sudden confusion: Are fluids part of R5RS? If so, why do we need the
> parameters SRFI? I guess I need to go and reread it.)
No no no, fluids are not part of R5RS. I think we should implement
the parameter SRFI in the core and start using it for thing
