I agree that a few lines of code for backwards compat are warranted.
Really it's a bug that user code needs to do anything, but I don't
think that's worth it.
The comments about 'new enough' are unsatisfying; if you could give a
version that's too old, and one that's new enough it would help
great
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree that a few lines of code for backwards compat are warranted.
> Really it's a bug that user code needs to do anything, but I don't
> think that's worth it.
Agreed. It's not ideal, but seems a reasonable compromise.
> The comments about 'new enoug
