Re: [PATCH] Fixing `gc-live-object-stats'

2005-12-03 Thread Neil Jerram
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hi, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >>>2005-11-17 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> * gc-card.c (scm_i_card_statistics): Return if BITVEC is NULL. >>> This was typically hit when running

Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3

2005-12-03 Thread Neil Jerram
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> To be completely concrete about what I mean, here is a version of >> your patch which I prefer (untested except by make check). > > Hmm. Your approach make 'load' configurable so that it can use > different

What's the matter with "scm_string_p()"?

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Korb
Hi Guys, In trying to "upgrade" things and expunge the "gh_" interface, I tried to use "scm_string_p()" as a replacement for "gh_string_p()". That lead to an extraordinarily obtuse seg fault that was only solved by using gh_string_p(), despite its being deprecated. (Both would appropriately retur

Re: What's the matter with "scm_string_p()"?

2005-12-03 Thread Kevin Ryde
Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Anybody with any guesses as to why? It'd have to be something pretty obscure, since gh_string_p is just return scm_is_true (scm_string_p (val)) ___ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://