Hi,
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to release 1.6.8 quite soon.
>
> Given that, if there are issues that need to be resolved that you
> think I might overlook, please speak up.
Just to let you know: on `powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu', the compilation
went fine and the test suite
Hi Neil,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for taking my considerations into account and producing this
> update. My gut feel is that I do like this new patch better, but I'd
> like to think about it more. I also need to go back and finish my
> draft reply to your previous email
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > FAIL: time.test: strftime %Z doesn't return garbage
>
> Can you pick out the code from that test to see what it does return?
> (It's supposed to test that the timezone string passes straight
> through.)
strfti
[taking this bit separately]
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> There's a buglet in the guile info docs in that strftime has a cross
> reference to the libc info file, and that would seem to be Linux
> specific.
You mean gnu-specific of course, strftime probably doesn't go near the
kerne
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I didn't find C99 specs for strftime, so I don't know if programs are
> required to set tm_zone before calling strftime.
The bit about %Z is
%Z is replaced by the locale's time zone name or
abbreviation, or by no characte