Re: [PATCH] Source properties on arbitrary non-immediate values

2005-10-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But cf currently just one empty string, > > (eq? "" "") => #t This also is made compulsory by R5RS. Ludovic. ___ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-d

Re: [PATCH] Source properties on arbitrary non-immediate values

2005-10-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's fair enough. I guess the rationale is that the unit of > evaluation (as presented in backtraces for example) is a list, so it > is useful for source properties to be stored on lists when those are > read. Sure. > Yes, but why is that useful?

Re: compile fixen

2005-10-11 Thread Andy Wingo
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 07:39 +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote: > Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Also the build stopped when building the texinfo files, because I had no > > version.texi. I had to make stamp-vti in the doc/ref and doc/tut dirs to > > make the version.texi files, > > That shou

Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader

2005-10-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Let's not forget this thread (see <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), it's s interesting! Was my message so convincing that you don't know what to answer? ;-) Thanks, Ludovic. ___ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/l

Re: [PATCH] Source properties on arbitrary non-immediate values

2005-10-11 Thread Neil Jerram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi, > > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Yes, but why is that useful? > > Why is it useless? ;-) I didn't say it was! I just wanted you to describe your motivation in more concrete terms. There are a couple of reasons why it seems obvio

Re: doc getsockopt, setsockopt

2005-10-11 Thread Kevin Ryde
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > follow the BSD way, and translate 0.0.0.x/8 in the second arg into > setting imr_ifindex on Linux. > > follow the Linux way, and make it a vector of 3 and translate back > into the 0.0.0.x/8 on BSD. > > I prefer the first way, since this is orgina

Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader

2005-10-11 Thread Neil Jerram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi, > > Let's not forget this thread (see <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), it's s > interesting! Was my message so convincing that you don't know what to > answer? ;-) I'll reply separately to some of the details in your other message, but overall I don't