Hi Neil,
Thanks for this detailed analysis!
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is nice; but concerns about whether it fits with transformer are:
>
> - Transformer is specified with #:use-syntax followed by module name,
> which is a lot different from your syntax. I prefer your syn
Hi,
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have doubts. Can you give more examples of when it might be used?
> Elisp syntax is probably not a good example, since elisp code wouldn't
> start with "define-module".
There are really two questions in your message. One is "do we really
need synt
