Guten Tag,
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, but mostly because I think the type is not really an important
> ingredient when using Unicode exclusively, since we know concretely
> what we want and don't need to rely on wchar_t as a portability aid.
> (There will of course be funct
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Right. And is it something you would like to have for 1.8 or is it a
> longer-term goal?
Unicode should come immediately after 1.8 is released.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
