Neil Jerram wrote:
>
> I'm not sure it's that obscure, and it seems a shame to leave this as
> ammunition for those who like to claim that Guile is not R5RS-compliant.
Another possibility would be to do what SCM does. If I understand
correctly, SCM does the list construction that we have noted a
Hi!
I've developed the following patch, which fixes R5RS-compatibility for
printing symbols starting/ending with ':'. The problem with the
current behaviour is that you end-up with files that can not be read
from other Schemes when you write out such symbols:
guile> (write ':foo) (newline)
#{:foo
