Hi,
Just a late observation :)
On Fri 18 Oct 2013 18:21, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
writes:
> I did some tests witha C-based vhash implementation, it's possible to
> increse the speed by 30x compared to current vlist imlpementation in
> guile.
If you are using stable-2.0 you are using a bad has
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Court$(D+2(Bs) writes:
> I wonder if there$B!G(Bs some other data structure with similar properties
> that doesn$B!G(Bt have the thread-safety issue. Maybe Ian has an idea?
HAMTs (another Bagwell creation) might be a reasonable option, but I
don't have a complete impl
Stefan Israelsson Tampe skribis:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Hi, Stefan,
>>
>> Stefan Israelsson Tampe skribis:
>>
>> > I did some tests witha C-based vhash implementation, it's possible to
>> > increse the speed by 30x compared to current vlist imlpementation
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi, Stefan,
>
> Stefan Israelsson Tampe skribis:
>
> > I did some tests witha C-based vhash implementation, it's possible to
> > increse the speed by 30x compared to current vlist imlpementation in
> > guile. It would be possible to get t
Hi, Stefan,
Stefan Israelsson Tampe skribis:
> I did some tests witha C-based vhash implementation, it's possible to
> increse the speed by 30x compared to current vlist imlpementation in
> guile. It would be possible to get this speed today if one implemented
> vhash-assoc as a VM op. Anyway u
Hi all,
I did some tests witha C-based vhash implementation, it's possible to
increse the speed by 30x compared to current vlist imlpementation in
guile. It would be possible to get this speed today if one implemented
vhash-assoc as a VM op. Anyway using the source as a standard lib will
get you
