Remember it's not symbols but code objects that this refers to so I need to
use the syntactic information and only augment the objects that can be
joined
and leave the other syntactic objects like symbols from another module and
so
on.
I will try to leave the struct representation and use only lis
Hi Stefan,
On Mon 23 Jan 2012 17:06, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
writes:
> and when parse is ready to unpack S we could have
>
> S = #(syntax-object # wrap-part hygiene)
>
> Now I basically solve this problem by constructing
Why do syntax->datum and datum->syntax not work for you to pack and
unpac
, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Thu 19 Jan 2012 10:50, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
> writes:
>
> > Working on porting syntax-parse is a learning experience and I know
> > understand how it uses syntax-local-value as a way to lookup a syntax
> > object by join
Hi Stefan,
On Thu 19 Jan 2012 10:50, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
writes:
> Working on porting syntax-parse is a learning experience and I know
> understand how it uses syntax-local-value as a way to lookup a syntax
> object by joining the wraps together with the total wrap at the mac
Hi,
Working on porting syntax-parse is a learning experience and I know
understand how it uses
syntax-local-value as a way to lookup a syntax object by joining the wraps
together with the
total wrap at the macro call.
The question is if this really are the total wrap e.g. contains the history
of
Ok, I have tried follow your suggestion,
here is what I could make,
(with-fluids ((*macro-lookup*
(lambda (e)
(cond
((number? e)
(pk w))
((symbol? e)
Thanks for taking time to help with this!
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes:
> > diff --git a/module/ice-9/psyntax.scm b/module/ice-9/psyntax.scm
> > index e522f54..70463a5 100644
> > --- a/module/ice-9/psyntax.scm
> > +++ b/mod
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes:
> diff --git a/module/ice-9/psyntax.scm b/module/ice-9/psyntax.scm
> index e522f54..70463a5 100644
> --- a/module/ice-9/psyntax.scm
> +++ b/module/ice-9/psyntax.scm
> @@ -155,6 +155,10 @@
> (eval-when (compile)
>(set-current-module (resolve-module '
information used at a lookup
in psyntax for an identifier
but it would be better if it returns a lookup procedure that applied to a
syntax object gives the lookuped
information assuming that psyntax is not mutating. using this primitive we
can design a syntax-local-value
according to racket
e.
6 hours ago, Andy Wingo wrote:
>
> > syntax-local-value
> >
> > e.g.
> > http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/stxtrans.html#%28def._%28%28quote._~23~25kernel%29._syntax-local-value%29%29
>
> We don't have this. It wouldn't be too hard to implement th
On Mon 05 Dec 2011 19:12, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
writes:
> (define-syntax info
> (lambda (x)
> (syntax-case x ()
> ((_ x)
> (pk (syntax-binding-info (syntax->datum #'x)))
> #'#f
I agree with Ian that we should be operating on syntax objects here, not
on datums.
On Sun 04 Dec 2011 20:22, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
writes:
> In looking at racket syntax-parse there seems to be some advanced macrology
> that is not included in guile.
Indeed :)
> syntax-local-value
>
> e.g.
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/stxtrans.html#%28def
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Ian Price wrote:
> Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes:
>
> > So I tried to get hold of the macro binding. So with the following patch
> wich should be enogh
> > for me to make progress porting rackets syntax parse to guile.
> >
> > Would be very glad if we could
Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes:
> So I tried to get hold of the macro binding. So with the following patch wich
> should be enogh
> for me to make progress porting rackets syntax parse to guile.
>
> Would be very glad if we could find a interface to expose this information
> that is sane
> and
h meta information to macros local or not by using
a weak hash.
Anyway a hack but it shows what is needed.
Happy Hacking :-)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Date: Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:22 PM
Subject: syntax-local-value
To: guile-devel
In looking at racket
In looking at racket syntax-parse there seems to be some advanced macrology
that is not included in guile.
The light now is on the possibility to attach data to macros. I figure that
I could
reproduce this by using a weak hash-table but miss the functionality of
syntax-local-value
e.g.
http
16 matches
Mail list logo
