Ni Neil,
On Sun 31 May 2009 01:07, Neil Jerram writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> In the short term (within the next year or so), I would imagine that
>> ceval/deval would be faster than an eval written in Scheme -- though I
>> do not know.
>
> I wasn't thinking of an eval written in Scheme. I
Andy Wingo writes:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Mon 25 May 2009 23:57, Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>>
For loading uncompiled scripts, things will be slower, unless your
modules #:use-syntax some other transformer. I don't know where
Hi Neil,
On Mon 25 May 2009 23:57, Neil Jerram writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> For loading uncompiled scripts, things will be slower, unless your
>>> modules #:use-syntax some other transformer. I don't know where the
>>> tradeoff is between the i
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> For loading uncompiled scripts, things will be slower, unless your
>> modules #:use-syntax some other transformer. I don't know where the
>> tradeoff is between the increased expansion speed due to compilation and
>> slow
Hello,
Andy Wingo writes:
> For loading uncompiled scripts, things will be slower, unless your
> modules #:use-syntax some other transformer. I don't know where the
> tradeoff is between the increased expansion speed due to compilation and
> slowdown due to a complete codewalk, but it's certainl
Hi!
On Sun 24 May 2009 00:03, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I'm slightly concerned that doing things ahead of time rather than just
> in time (i.e., lazily) would have a negative impact on the interpreter's
> start-up time, which may be noticeable for short-lived scripts.
In the guile
Hello!
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Sat 23 May 2009 11:52, Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> With psyntax running a pre-analysis phase on all source code, we can do
>>> away with lazy memoization entirely -- a neat hack, but it made eval.c
>>> buggy and impenetrable. I'll write mor
Hi Neil,
On Sat 23 May 2009 11:52, Neil Jerram writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> With psyntax running a pre-analysis phase on all source code, we can do
>> away with lazy memoization entirely -- a neat hack, but it made eval.c
>> buggy and impenetrable. I'll write more about that in the future.
Andy Wingo writes:
> With psyntax running a pre-analysis phase on all source code, we can do
> away with lazy memoization entirely -- a neat hack, but it made eval.c
> buggy and impenetrable. I'll write more about that in the future.
Anticipating your "more in the future", do you mean that the
p
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Fri 22 May 2009 17:10, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> I'm catching up with mail. On my syncase-in-boot-9 branch, I enabled
>>> compilation of srfi-18 and fixed a bug in it regarding multiple-value
>>> returns. Now I just ran the srfi-1
On Fri 22 May 2009 17:10, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> ¡Hola!
>
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> I'm catching up with mail. On my syncase-in-boot-9 branch, I enabled
>> compilation of srfi-18 and fixed a bug in it regarding multiple-value
>> returns. Now I just ran the srfi-18 test like 100
¡Hola!
Andy Wingo writes:
> I'm catching up with mail. On my syncase-in-boot-9 branch, I enabled
> compilation of srfi-18 and fixed a bug in it regarding multiple-value
> returns. Now I just ran the srfi-18 test like 100 times in a row and it
> didn't show any strange errors. Yy!
What kind
I second the Yy!
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm catching up with mail. On my syncase-in-boot-9 branch, I enabled
> compilation of srfi-18 and fixed a bug in it regarding multiple-value
> returns. Now I just ran the srfi-18 test like 100 times in a row and i
Hi!
I'm catching up with mail. On my syncase-in-boot-9 branch, I enabled
compilation of srfi-18 and fixed a bug in it regarding multiple-value
returns. Now I just ran the srfi-18 test like 100 times in a row and it
didn't show any strange errors. Yy!
With psyntax running a pre-analysis phase
14 matches
Mail list logo
