Re: scm_raise using raise()

2006-12-31 Thread Neil Jerram
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a reason scm_raise is implemented using kill() instead of > raise()? Not that I know of. Regards, Neil ___ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guil

scm_raise using raise()

2006-12-13 Thread Kevin Ryde
Is there a reason scm_raise is implemented using kill() instead of raise()? I suppose raise() is a C89-ism, but nowadays it can be used unconditionally can't it? (And in fact for instance mingw has raise but not kill.) ___ Guile-devel mailing list Gui