Andy Wingo writes:
> On Mon 21 Mar 2011 22:50, Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> - "gel" is short; and it's the name of Guile before it was Guile; and
>> suggests sticking things together; and AFAIK isn't already being used
>> for anything else; and has similar key positions as "gdo", so is
>> equa
> Howdy,
>
> On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> > Andy Wingo writes:
> >
> >> "Guido, compile my-file.scm."
> >
> > Is the pun[*] intended? :-)
>
> OK, point taken. Too bad though!
>
> I have another proposal, but first I want to elaborate on why I think
> g
The coolness is irrefutable. :-)
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> "Guido, compile my-file.scm."
>>
>> Is the pun[*] intended? :-)
>
> OK, point taken. Too bad though!
Howdy,
On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> "Guido, compile my-file.scm."
>
> Is the pun[*] intended? :-)
OK, point taken. Too bad though!
I have another proposal, but first I want to elaborate on why I think
guile-tools is a silly name.
On Mon 21 Mar 2011 22:50, Neil Jerram writes:
> - "gel" is short; and it's the name of Guile before it was Guile; and
> suggests sticking things together; and AFAIK isn't already being used
> for anything else; and has similar key positions as "gdo", so is
> equally easy to type.
Gel is go
Andy Wingo writes:
> This is fun :)
>
> Here are a few threads the PLT folk had:
>
>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.devel/2540
>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.devel/2693/focus=2715
>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.plt.devel/2775
Well indeed, tha
On Mon 21 Mar 2011 15:10, Neil Jerram writes:
> On 21 March 2011 12:16, Barry Fishman wrote:
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
FWIW I’m happy with the verbose name and I fear the joke wouldn’t be to
everyone’s taste. I’d als
On 21 March 2011 12:16, Barry Fishman wrote:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>> FWIW I’m happy with the verbose name and I fear the joke wouldn’t be to
>>> everyone’s taste. I’d also be happy with a shorter name, though.
>>
>> OK. Anyo
Barry Fishman wrote:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
> > On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> >> FWIW I’m happy with the verbose name and I fear the joke wouldn’t be to
> >> everyone’s taste. I’d also be happy with a shorter name, though.
> >
> > OK. Anyone have any
Le Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:27:13 +0100,
Andy Wingo a écrit :
> On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> > Andy Wingo writes:
> >
> >> it has a pleasant subject-verb-object when you say it: "Guido, compile
> >> my-file.scm."
> >
> > Is the pun[*] intended? :-)
>
> Not r
On Mon, Mar 21 2011, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> it has a pleasant subject-verb-object when you say it: "Guido, compile
>> my-file.scm."
>
> Is the pun[*] intended? :-)
A more or less obvious pun (but not as smooth grammatically) would be
beguile(d)... "beguiled in
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> FWIW I’m happy with the verbose name and I fear the joke wouldn’t be to
>> everyone’s taste. I’d also be happy with a shorter name, though.
>
> OK. Anyone have any other good short names?
If you like short
> > On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> >
> > > Andy Wingo writes:
> > >
> > >> it has a pleasant subject-verb-object when you say it: "Guido, compile
> > >> my-file.scm."
> > >
> > > Is the pun[*] intended? :-)
> >
> > Not really, no :)
> >
> > > FWIW I’m happy
> On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> > Andy Wingo writes:
> >
> >> it has a pleasant subject-verb-object when you say it: "Guido, compile
> >> my-file.scm."
> >
> > Is the pun[*] intended? :-)
>
> Not really, no :)
>
> > FWIW I’m happy with the verbose name an
On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> it has a pleasant subject-verb-object when you say it: "Guido, compile
>> my-file.scm."
>
> Is the pun[*] intended? :-)
Not really, no :)
> FWIW I’m happy with the verbose name and I fear the joke wouldn
Hey!
Andy Wingo writes:
> it has a pleasant subject-verb-object when you say it: "Guido, compile
> my-file.scm."
Is the pun[*] intended? :-)
FWIW I’m happy with the verbose name and I fear the joke wouldn’t be to
everyone’s taste. I’d also be happy with a shorter name, though.
Thanks,
Ludo’
Hello all,
Like many of you, I am enamored of the "git style" of command line
interfaces: "git add this", "git commit that", etc.
Guile has guile-tools, which, though not well documented, does support
this. "guile-tools compile foo" loads the `(scripts compile)' module,
and punts argument proces
17 matches
Mail list logo
