Hi Mark!
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> I have a few comments on your v2.0.2-70-gcf14f30 commit:
>
>> + (define (pure-expression? x)
>> +;; Return true if X is pure---i.e., if it is known to have no
>> +;; effects and does not allocate new storage. Note: is
>> +;; not "pure" because it
Hi Ludovic!
Thanks for your work on partial evaluation, this is very exciting! :)
I have a few comments on your v2.0.2-70-gcf14f30 commit:
> + (define (pure-expression? x)
> +;; Return true if X is pure---i.e., if it is known to have no
> +;; effects and does not allocate new storage.
