Hello,
We are pleased to announce Guile-Clutter 1.12.2.1, the next maintenance
release for the Guile-Clutter 1.0 series.
* Guile-Clutter Homepage:
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile-gnome/clutter
* Guile-Clutter 1.12.2.1 release tarball GPG signature [*]:
http
Le 2015-11-19 05:43, David Pirotte a écrit :
Hello,
We are pleased to announce Guile-Clutter 1.12.2, the next maintenance
release for the Guile-Clutter 1.0 series.
Thanks David and the team for making GNOME Clutter available in GNU
Guile. I really like Clutter (and clutter but that
Hello,
We are pleased to announce Guile-Clutter 1.12.2, the next maintenance
release for the Guile-Clutter 1.0 series.
* Guile-Clutter Homepage:
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile-gnome/clutter
* Guile-Clutter 1.12.2 release tarball GPG signature [*]:
http
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: I worked and pushed another 7 patches (*)
Getting close to a 1.12.2 release:
-] guile-clutter now pass make distcheck
-] no more guile nor clutter related warnings anymore
there are texi
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel:
bf13c6b fix g-wrap version dependency
I wrote and pushed a tiny patch which fixes g-wrap's version dependency.
Happy hacking.
David
From bf13c6b3a32dea557cbad931f57949bd1e0265d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PI
> Hello again :)
Yes, hello,
Saturday greetings!
> ... So let us not argue over that. Let us instead treat your concern as
> request
> that the behavior should be different.
Perfect, let's talk about ... should we, how, how much :) ...
> > we should follow the clos spec here
> That said I t
Hello Andy,
> > With the stable-2.0 or master branches, the current behavior is:
> >
> > scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (oop goops))
> > scheme@(guile-user)> (define-class ()
> > ... (foo #:getter foo #:init-keyword #:foo))
> > scheme@(guile-user)> (define-class ())
> >
Hello again :)
On Sat 07 Feb 2015 01:06, David Pirotte writes:
>> So, we should be precise with terminology :) In GOOPS, subclasses do
>> not inherit accessor methods. (There was a bug in which they would; I
>> fixed that.) Each subclass gets its own accessor method defined, if and
>> only if
Hi again!
:)
> With the stable-2.0 or master branches, the current behavior is:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (oop goops))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (define-class ()
> ... (foo #:getter foo #:init-keyword #:foo))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (define-class ())
> scheme@(guil
Hi :)
On Fri 06 Feb 2015 18:09, David Pirotte writes:
> (2) I have a different answer from my guile version for the second
> part [which I think is the correct answer, maybe you wanted to paste
> some other code [?], don't know.
Part of my mail described buggy Guile 2.0. Please re-read to be s
Hello Andy,
> May I first please reduce your test case. Here is an equivalent
> version:
sure, especially because it is not 'my' test case :) which got us very
confused: when you were talking about this one, I was thinking about
another... which to remove the confusion I
Hello,
May I first please reduce your test case. Here is an equivalent
version:
(use-modules (oop goops))
(define-class ()
(foo #:getter foo #:init-keyword #:foo))
(define-class ())
(define obj (make #:foo 34))
(define-method (foo (self ))
(pk "ahoy!")
(next-method))
(
Hello Andy,
> $ /opt/guile-1.8/bin/guile
> guile> (use-modules (oop goops))
> guile> (define-class ()
> ...(width #:accessor width #:init-keyword #:width #:init-value 0))
> guile> (define-class ())
> guile> (define b (make ))
> guile> (width b)
> 0
> guile
Andy,
> Are you certain? What git revision are you using? I don't think the
> test should "work" with the current stable-2.0 or master, or 1.8 for
> that matter.
> $ /opt/guile-1.8/bin/guile
> guile> (use-modules (oop goops))
> guile> (define-class ()
> ...(width #:accessor
Hello Andy,
> > david@capac:~/alto/projects/guile-tests/goops 15 $ guile
> > GNU Guile 2.0.11.113-583a
>
> This version had bugs, as I tried to explain. Please update your
> stable-2.0 and try again. Thanks :)
as an aside note, yesterday I did not pull, i thought all the comments
you
On Wed 28 Jan 2015 04:05, David Pirotte writes:
> david@capac:~/alto/projects/guile-tests/goops 15 $ guile
> GNU Guile 2.0.11.113-583a
This version had bugs, as I tried to explain. Please update your
stable-2.0 and try again. Thanks :)
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Hi again,
and, to be very very precise, I even renamed my directory now [which appears in
the
compilation trace] because its previous name was terrible (and terribly wrong)!
so, the appropriate directory name is: .../setter-inheritance-bug
[ the new trace is here below, 'in place'
Hello Andy,
we should change the subject or start a new thread, maybe
> Are you certain? What git revision are you using? I don't think the
> test should "work" with the current stable-2.0 or master, or 1.8 for
> that matter.
Oh no, it's not working as it should, too bad: this time I
On Tue 27 Jan 2015 20:11, David Pirotte writes:
>> The setters inheritance bug is fixed to be like 1.8.
>
> Thanks, it _does_ work as expected now, now as in using the latest
> stable-2.0!
Are you certain? What git revision are you using? I don't think the
test should "work" with the current s
To be complete, raise the confusion, and allow who would want to follow and
test, the setter bug test case I pasted on irc was this one (*):
Using guile versions previous to the goops refactoring work Andy did recently,
you'd
have this answer:
scheme@(guile-user)> ,use (oop goops)
Hello Andy,
- we should not have mixed the 'accessor' problem as reported by
another user and the setter bug I reported [on irc];
- also I should have reported a separate bug to bug-gu...@gnu.org, but I
thought we perfectly understood each other, I was wrong and we
On Tue 27 Jan 2015 02:00, David Pirotte writes:
>> Can you make a test case without guile-gnome?
>
> No, it is a guile-gnome problem/bug, so here below, a very short test case (*)
OK, then please file it in the guile-gnome bugzilla. Thanks. We
probably don't need to talk about it on guile-dev
Hello Andy,
> > It would be really nice if someone can help me with the following
> > unexpected bug:
>> ...
> What is the bug?
I don't think I could better summarize then what I did in the subject:
guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:vir
On Fri 19 Dec 2014 20:46, David Pirotte writes:
> It would be really nice if someone can help me with the following unexpected
> bug:
>
> http://paste.lisp.org/+33RA
>
> I don't think i'll be able to solve it by myself, at this level of knowledge
> I have
> from both goops [implementation
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel:
55a58b8 fix clutter_text_get_color needs a special wrapper
I wrote and pushed a patch with special wrapper for clutter_text_get_color
Happy hacking.
David
From 55a58b8216b7f4bc3fcad3294547e6a7bafe01ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Guilers,
debian testing
guile-gnome, devel branch
make fails
[ note that guile-clutter will fail the 'same way', creating a dependency upon
[ /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo-gobject.la
I won't be able to solve this problem by myself, by far. In the mean ti
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: the 6 latest patches now pushed (*)
Happy hacking,
David
(*) 0052719 fix clutter_actor_get_margin needs a special wrapper
ee05442 removing example based upon deprecated functionality
bf6fe37 update tests
Hi Panicz,
I don't think you did read the paste (3 parts) carefully, since the first part
of
the paste is a goops example [no guile-gnome[clutter] code] that does work, as
expected.
> My first impression is that the error might be caused by using the
> combination of #:allocation #:virtual and #
Hi,
My first impression is that the error might be caused by using the
combination of #:allocation #:virtual and #:init-keyword for the "colour"
slot. Since #:init-keyword initializes slot value with a given value, and
virtual slots have no actual value, the semantics of such operation is
rather u
Hello,
It would be really nice if someone can help me with the following unexpected
bug:
http://paste.lisp.org/+33RA
I don't think i'll be able to solve it by myself, at this level of knowledge I
have
from both goops [implementation I mean, knowledge close to zero] and the low
level
m
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel:
-] removing example based upon deprecated functionality;
-] fix clutter_actor_get_margin needs a special wrapper.
Happy hacking.
David
From ee05442e14c770a70c4ad941de2de00f5a211ee7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel:
-] fix .gitignore, globally ignoring html and trs files
-] gnoring 4 funtions, in 1.12, that needs a special wrapper
-] update tests/wrapset.api for 1.12
Happy hacking.
David
From
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: fix clutter_actor_get_background_color needs a special
wrapper
Happy hacking.
David
From e345c8b9135cab51e32f11fe56a6c104f6803c06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PIROTTE
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 17:48:17 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] fix
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: I have just pushed all patches I've been
working on
Happy hacking,
David
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: fix html doc generated files not beeing tracked by git
Happy hacking.
David
From 0d1e225733f6af1ce051a54ae4a25769f107a511 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PIROTTE
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:56:23 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 13/13] fix html doc
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: update previously existing generated documentation
Cheers,
David
From dbe2e3d3d1f6b8f198b35d738d46ab4edd93d03a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PIROTTE
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:01:54 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] update previously existing
a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> guile-clutter
> clutter-devel: add custom bindings for ClutterMatrix
>
> Patch review solicited.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>From 92388ae5c64b36e8323e453a4ce9cdefa26043d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PIROTTE
Date: Fri, 9 M
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: add custom bindings for ClutterMatrix
Patch review solicited.
Thanks,
David
>From 8f15c981e0d8c6fd089c28c6ca953ec02313c413 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PIROTTE
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 12:16:07 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] add cus
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: add custom bindings for ClutterRect
Patch review solicited.
Thanks,
David
>From 511cf91f53708978dae0ceb93d2288c5b1389427 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PIROTTE
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 17:06:19 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] add cus
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: add custom bindings for ClutterPoint and ClutterSize
Patch review solicited.
Thanks,
David
>From fd2da7831c966034649392ebac00214a3660b4cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PIROTTE
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:12:45 -0300
Subject: [PATCH
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: remove API deprecated in 1.12
Patch review solicited.
Thanks,
David
>From 5fda7b4af7e65719587c6c1983acf1a26daf07a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PIROTTE
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:23:34 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] remove API depreca
Oups,
> Patch review solicited: note that configure.ac did refer to an inexistant
> guile
> version, I think, which I deleted:
>
>GUILE_EFFECTIVE_VERSION=no
> -all_versions="2.2 2.0 1.10"
> +all_versions="2.2 2.0"
>
> I did mention that in the commit message though, should I
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: updating clutter and guile-clutter version references.
Patch review solicited: note that configure.ac did refer to an inexistant guile
version, I think, which I deleted:
GUILE_EFFECTIVE_VERSION=no
-all_versions="2.2 2.0
Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: fixing make check
Patch review solicited: note that I am autotool kind of blind. Thanks to
Ludovic who
kindly suggested, on irc, the corrections to be made, but please double check,
tx.
I think this patch should probably be also applied
Hi Mark,
> Rather:
> scm_scm_to_clutter_margin: Use scm_to_double, not scm_to_uint8.
>
> > * clutter/gnome/gw/clutter-support.c: scm_scm_to_clutter_margin to use
>
> Rather:
> * clutter/gnome/gw/clutter-support.c (scm_scm_to_clutter_margin): Use
Thank you, I have changed the commit message as s
Hi David,
David Pirotte writes:
> From a8166f67bd752ff7c71af50b27cfc52b2de4fe37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David PIROTTE
> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:24:43 -0300
> Subject: [PATCH] fixing ClutterMargin special wrapper
Rather:
scm_scm_to_clutter_margin: Use scm_to_double, not scm_to_uint8.
Hello,
Please review and let me know, if it's ok, I'll push it.
Thanks,
David
>From a8166f67bd752ff7c71af50b27cfc52b2de4fe37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PIROTTE
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:24:43 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] fixing ClutterMargin special wrapper
* clutter/gnome/gw/clutter-suppor
Hello guilers,
I started [slowly but hopefully surely :)] to work on updating our guile-clutter
binding from clutter 1.10.0 to clutter 1.12.2. [sorry in advance if some of the
questions I will ask may sound a bit stupid, my knowledge of involved lower
level
tools, modules, ... is quite
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Fri 09 Sep 2011 16:11, joa...@verona.se writes:
>
>> I would like to experiment with guile-clutter.
>> It seems, though, that guile-clutter is a bit out of date and wont build
>> with clutter-1.0 which is shipped with Fedora 15.
>>
>&
On Fri 09 Sep 2011 16:11, joa...@verona.se writes:
> I would like to experiment with guile-clutter.
> It seems, though, that guile-clutter is a bit out of date and wont build
> with clutter-1.0 which is shipped with Fedora 15.
>
> Is this correct or have I missed something?
It&#
I would like to experiment with guile-clutter.
It seems, though, that guile-clutter is a bit out of date and wont build
with clutter-1.0 which is shipped with Fedora 15.
Is this correct or have I missed something?
If I manualy change the required clutter version to 1.0 I get the error
below
51 matches
Mail list logo
