Hi Mikael!
Mikael Djurfeldt skribis:
> Could the frequency of GC be adapted similarly such that the balance
> between GC and allocation is shifted towards allocation in phases with a
> lot of heap growth?
I guess we’ve been mostly “end users” of libgc, assuming the right
design decisions were m
Den ons 5 feb. 2020 23:32Han-Wen Nienhuys skrev:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 5:23 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Weird. It would be interesting to see where the slowdown comes from.
>> Overall, my recollection of the 1.8 to 2.0 transition (where we
>> introduced libgc) is that GC was a bit fas
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 5:23 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Weird. It would be interesting to see where the slowdown comes from.
> Overall, my recollection of the 1.8 to 2.0 transition (where we
> introduced libgc) is that GC was a bit faster, definitely not slower.
>
> That said, does LilyPond happ
Hi Han-Wen,
Great to see you back here!
Han-Wen Nienhuys skribis:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:41 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> Unfortunately, it looks like the adoption of the BDW GC library caused
>> a ~6x slowdown, causing an overall end-to-end slowdown of 50%.
>>
>> I was wondering if you
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:41 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Unfortunately, it looks like the adoption of the BDW GC library caused
> a ~6x slowdown, causing an overall end-to-end slowdown of 50%.
>
> I was wondering if you folks would have tips to further tune GC for
> wall-time speed, and if there
(please CC replies directly to me; I am not on the guile-devel list.)
Arne mentioned
>This might be the read-function which is slower in 2.2. You might want
>to try to go directly to Guile 3, in which the read function should be
>on par with the read in 1.8.
I'd rather avoid making a jump to GUI
Hi Han-Wen,
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> after a long hiatus I have started getting involved with LilyPond
> again, and one of the things I'd like to do is get LilyPond off GUILE
> 1.8.
That’s great! Thank you very much!
> Unfortunately, it looks like the adoption of the BDW GC library caused
> a
Hi folks,
after a long hiatus I have started getting involved with LilyPond
again, and one of the things I'd like to do is get LilyPond off GUILE
1.8. Experiments suggest that starting from GUILE 2.2, the execution
performance is on par with 1.8. There are 2 open issues: caching byte
compiled fil
