Hi,
On Wed 04 Mar 2009 09:48, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> So I was thinking: why do we have this fetish for prohibiting certain
>> forms in a non-toplevel context? I am of a mind to replace eval-case
>> with eval-when, which is actually more expressive, as it
Hello!
Andy Wingo writes:
> So I was thinking: why do we have this fetish for prohibiting certain
> forms in a non-toplevel context? I am of a mind to replace eval-case
> with eval-when, which is actually more expressive, as it allows us to
> discriminate the different phases in non-toplevel con
Andy Wingo writes:
> So I was thinking: why do we have this fetish for prohibiting certain
> forms in a non-toplevel context? I am of a mind to replace eval-case
> with eval-when, which is actually more expressive, as it allows us to
> discriminate the different phases in non-toplevel contexts as
Hi all,
I've been hacking at the compiler in recent days, separating out
expansion from compilation (currently they are intertwingled, which
produces some bugs), and making GHIL a more simple language, more
amenable to optimization.
I've grown to really like syncase in its psyntax.scm incarnation
