Re: empty default duplicates handler

2007-08-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it supposed to work to set the default duplicates handling to an > empty list? Why not, but we need to define the semantics. > It seems to work in 1.8, but in the head it's giving > > => Unbound variable: map In `resolve_duplicate_binding (

empty default duplicates handler

2007-08-21 Thread Kevin Ryde
Is it supposed to work to set the default duplicates handling to an empty list? Eg. foo.scm containing (define-module (foo) #:duplicates () #:use-module (srfi srfi-1)) (pk map) It seems to work in 1.8, but in the head it's giving => Unbound variable: