> On 29 Jun 2018, at 17:35, Chris Vine wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:34:07 +0200
> Hans Åberg wrote:
>>> If, say, uint8_t is available in stdint.h for C, it
>>> will be available for C++. §21.4.1/2 of C++17 makes this even more
>>> explicit: "The [cstdint] header defines all types and mac
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:34:07 +0200
Hans Åberg wrote:
> > On 29 Jun 2018, at 12:10, Chris Vine wrote:
> >
> >> For C++, these are only optional, cf. [1], as they require no padding. So
> >> an alternative is to typedef the obligatory int_fast<2^k>_t types, perhaps
> >> leaving the API unchanged
> On 29 Jun 2018, at 12:10, Chris Vine wrote:
>
>> For C++, these are only optional, cf. [1], as they require no padding. So an
>> alternative is to typedef the obligatory int_fast<2^k>_t types, perhaps
>> leaving the API unchanged.
>>
>> 1. https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/integer
>
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:39:33 +0200
Hans Åberg wrote:
> > On 29 Jun 2018, at 09:39, Andy Wingo wrote:
> >
> > It would seem that the first four
> > features of C99 are OK for all platforms that we target, with the
> > following caveats:
> >
> > * We should avoid using C++ keywords (e.g. throw) i
> On 29 Jun 2018, at 09:39, Andy Wingo wrote:
>
> It would seem that the first four
> features of C99 are OK for all platforms that we target, with the
> following caveats:
>
> * We should avoid using C++ keywords (e.g. throw) in Guile API files.
>
> * We might want to avoid mixed decls and s
On Sat 23 Jun 2018 22:12, Andy Wingo writes:
> Is there anyone who compiles Guile with a compiler that does not support
> C99? If so, please give platform and compiler.
>
> I think my questions are limited to, in decreasing order of importance:
>
> * Is there any system that we target that doe
Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
> > Is there anyone who compiles Guile with a compiler that does not support
> > C99? If so, please give platform and compiler.
>
> Not really the question you asked, and pretty fuzzy, but an anecdote
> about a real situation I am aware of:
>
> In
Andy Wingo writes:
> Is there anyone who compiles Guile with a compiler that does not support
> C99? If so, please give platform and compiler.
Not really the question you asked, and pretty fuzzy, but an anecdote
about a real situation I am aware of:
In 2015--2016, there was some C code that
Andy Wingo writes:
> Is there anyone who compiles Guile with a compiler that does not support
> C99? If so, please give platform and compiler.
As you probably know, I'm currently looking into bootstrapping GuixSD
from source.
I'd like to see Guile become more bootstrappable, i.e., less C code a
> From: Andy Wingo
> Cc: guile-us...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 22:07:24 +0200
>
> > MS-Windows (MinGW) doesn't have a C99 compliant C library, although
> > quite a few of what's needed is present.
>
> Hard to say :) I think my questions are limited to, in decreasing
On Sat 23 Jun 2018 21:23, Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> From: Andy Wingo
>> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:11:29 +0200
>> Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
>>
>> Is there anyone who compiles Guile with a compiler that does not support
>> C99? If so, please give platform and compiler.
>
> You mean C99 compiler or
> From: Andy Wingo
> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:11:29 +0200
> Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
>
> Is there anyone who compiles Guile with a compiler that does not support
> C99? If so, please give platform and compiler.
You mean C99 compiler or C99 C run-time library? Or both?
MS-Windows (MinGW) doesn
Hi,
Is there anyone who compiles Guile with a compiler that does not support
C99? If so, please give platform and compiler.
Thanks,
Andy
13 matches
Mail list logo
