On 26 May 2012, at 14:44, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hans Aberg skribis:
>
>> On 25 May 2012, at 17:31, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>>> Ken Raeburn skribis:
>>>
* Don't use addresses of code labels with LLVM, even if the compiler
supports them. At least with the version of LLVM GCC on
Hi,
Hans Aberg skribis:
> On 25 May 2012, at 17:31, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Ken Raeburn skribis:
>>
>>> * Don't use addresses of code labels with LLVM, even if the compiler
>>> supports them. At least with the version of LLVM GCC on my Mac ("gcc
>>> version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. buil
On 25 May 2012, at 17:31, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Ken Raeburn skribis:
>
>> * Don't use addresses of code labels with LLVM, even if the compiler
>> supports them. At least with the version of LLVM GCC on my Mac ("gcc
>> version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build
>> 2336.1.00)")
Hi,
Ken Raeburn skribis:
> * Don't use addresses of code labels with LLVM, even if the compiler
> supports them. At least with the version of LLVM GCC on my Mac ("gcc
> version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build
> 2336.1.00)"),
Damn, what compiler is this? It’s not the old GCC