> On 16 Jul 2019, at 15:18, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg writes:
>> Now, I don't know if this is something you think would be nice to have
>> baked into Guile, but I really liked the idea, and thought to share it
>> in the case you would, too (and have't thought of i
Hans Åberg writes:
> Now, I don't know if this is something you think would be nice to have
> baked into Guile, but I really liked the idea, and thought to share it
> in the case you would, too (and have't thought of it yet). :)
>>> (define ≥ >=)
> I have used such symbols for math
> On 16 Jul 2019, at 14:41, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
>
Now, I don't know if this is something you think would be nice to have
baked into Guile, but I really liked the idea, and thought to share it
in the case you would, too (and have't thought of
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
>>> Now, I don't know if this is something you think would be nice to have
>>> baked into Guile, but I really liked the idea, and thought to share it
>>> in the case you would, too (and have't thought of it yet). :)
>>
>> I think this could be implemented as a libr
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Tirifto writes:
>
>> I was recently looking into Perl 6 and noticed a very neat feature
>> about it: Unicode operators! That is, it makes use of some Unicode
>> symbols to offer alternatives to awkward or verbose ASCII notation.
>> For instance, ‘>=’ and ‘<=’ may just a
Tirifto writes:
> I was recently looking into Perl 6 and noticed a very neat feature
> about it: Unicode operators! That is, it makes use of some Unicode
> symbols to offer alternatives to awkward or verbose ASCII notation.
> For instance, ‘>=’ and ‘<=’ may just as well be written as ‘≥’ and
>
Hello all!
I was recently looking into Perl 6 and noticed a very neat feature
about it: Unicode operators! That is, it makes use of some Unicode
symbols to offer alternatives to awkward or verbose ASCII notation.
For instance, ‘>=’ and ‘<=’ may just as well be written as ‘≥’ and
‘≤’, respectively.
