> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: m...@netris.org, wi...@pobox.com, guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:09:47 +0200
>
> >> >>> Eli Zaretskii writes:
> >> >>> > +# define getuid() (500) /* Local Administrator */
> >> >>> > +# define getgid() (513)
Eli Zaretskii skribis:
>> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , wi...@pobox.com, guile-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:04:23 +0200
>>
>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>
>> > Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> >
>> >>> From: Mark H Weaver
>> >>> Cc: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Co
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , wi...@pobox.com, guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:04:23 +0200
>
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
> > Eli Zaretskii writes:
> >
> >>> From: Mark H Weaver
> >>> Cc: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), wi...@pobox.com,
> >>> g
> From: Mark H Weaver
> Cc: wi...@pobox.com, l...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 03:44:15 -0400
>
> Most applications do not expose get*id/set*id to other programs as part
> of their public API.
Emacs exposes getuid, getgid, geteuid, and getegid, has been doing
that for
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
>>> From: Mark H Weaver
>>> Cc: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), wi...@pobox.com,
>>> guile-devel@gnu.org
>>> Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 19:02:08 -0400
>>>
>>> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>>> > +# define getuid() (500) /* Local Administrat
Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> From: Mark H Weaver
>> Cc: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), wi...@pobox.com,
>> guile-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 19:02:08 -0400
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> > +# define getuid() (500) /* Local Administrator */
>> > +# define getgid()
> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 06:47:37 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii
> Cc: wi...@pobox.com, l...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
>
> As I've said before, these operations either have no meaning on
> MS-Windows, or cannot be easily mapped to the equivalent Windows
> notions. All other applications ported f
> From: Mark H Weaver
> Cc: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), wi...@pobox.com,
> guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 19:02:08 -0400
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > +# define getuid() (500) /* Local Administrator */
> > +# define getgid() (513) /* None */
> > +#
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> +# define getuid() (500) /* Local Administrator */
> +# define getgid() (513) /* None */
> +# define setuid(u) (0)
> +# define setgid(g) (0)
As I've said before, I'm not comfortable with these definitions. These
are not op
> From: Andy Wingo
> Cc: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 16:43:34 +0200
>
> > @@ -659,7 +663,7 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_kill, "kill", 2, 0, 0,
> > #else
> >/* Mingw has raise(), but not kill(). (Other raw DOS environments might
> > be similar.)
On Sat 25 Jun 2016 15:31, Eli Zaretskii writes:
> [Please disregard the previous patch and use this one instead.]
Thanks for the updates. I have a couple of additional nits, having
applied and built the patch.
> @@ -659,7 +663,7 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_kill, "kill", 2, 0, 0,
> #else
>/* Mingw
[Please disregard the previous patch and use this one instead.]
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:02:42 +0200
>
> >> Great! I have two nits. One, if it is possible for you, please attach
> >> the patch in the format that "
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:02:42 +0200
>
> >> Great! I have two nits. One, if it is possible for you, please attach
> >> the patch in the format that "git format-patch" makes. That makes it
> >> easy to apply, other
Eli Zaretskii skribis:
>> From: Andy Wingo
>> Cc: l...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:51:53 +0200
>>
>> On Sat 25 Jun 2016 11:11, Eli Zaretskii writes:
>>
>> > Here's the modified patch with the couple of changes requested in
>> > response to the previous version:
> From: Andy Wingo
> Cc: l...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:51:53 +0200
>
> On Sat 25 Jun 2016 11:11, Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> > Here's the modified patch with the couple of changes requested in
> > response to the previous version:
>
> Great! I have two nits. On
On Sat 25 Jun 2016 11:11, Eli Zaretskii writes:
> Here's the modified patch with the couple of changes requested in
> response to the previous version:
Great! I have two nits. One, if it is possible for you, please attach
the patch in the format that "git format-patch" makes. That makes it
ea
Here's the modified patch with the couple of changes requested in
response to the previous version:
Author: Eli Zaretskii
Date: Fri Jun 25 12:10:34 2016 +0300
Provide support for open-process and related functions on MS-Windows
* libguile/w32-proc.c: New file, with MinGW support code
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:49:17 +0200
>
> > diff --git a/libguile/posix.c b/libguile/posix.c
> > index 2654716..35b920f 100644
> > --- a/libguile/posix.c
> > +++ b/libguile/posix.c
> > @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@
> > #if HAVE
> From: Andy Wingo
> Cc: l...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:45:36 +0200
>
> Thanks!
>
> I think it looks pretty good. I wouldn't mind committing as-is. I
> would like to hear what Ludovic or Mark thinks before doing do; WDYT?
It's obviously your call how to proceed
Eli Zaretskii skribis:
> commit 44f8eebf9850431790b23b031f5b6e90fb3de777
> Author: Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Fri Jun 24 12:45:02 2016 +0300
>
> Provide support for open-process and related functions on MS-Windows
>
> * libguile/w32-proc.c: New file, with MinGW support code for
> s
On Fri 24 Jun 2016 11:51, Eli Zaretskii writes:
> This is a re-spin of the patches last posted here:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2014-08/msg00015.html
>
> At Andy's suggestion, I've removed most of the Windows-specific code
> to the new Windows-specific file w32-proc.c, l
This is a re-spin of the patches last posted here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2014-08/msg00015.html
At Andy's suggestion, I've removed most of the Windows-specific code
to the new Windows-specific file w32-proc.c, leaving just the minimum
changes in posix.c itself. The patc
22 matches
Mail list logo
