Hi Andy,
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 01:47:29AM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Cky! Clearly I should have finished ploughing through guile-devel
> before we had the pleaseure of meeting up last week. Because if I had,
> I would have asked you to deliver two files: srfi-41.scm, and
> srfi-41.test :-)
Wo
Cky! Clearly I should have finished ploughing through guile-devel
before we had the pleaseure of meeting up last week. Because if I had,
I would have asked you to deliver two files: srfi-41.scm, and
srfi-41.test :-)
WDYT about that? :-)
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:28:07PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Could you integrate it in the Guile tree in a branch, as you proposed on
> IRC? It would make it easier to review it.
Indeed. I might only get to do that in the weekend, and with Christmas
and all that coming up, I can't even prom
Hello!
"Chris K. Jester-Young" skribis:
> Just writing to say that after many months of being busy with other
> stuff, I finally got around to finishing my Guile port of SRFI 41:
>
> https://github.com/cky/guile2-modules
Nice, thank you!
Could you integrate it in the Guile tree in a branch, as
Hi all,
Just writing to say that after many months of being busy with other
stuff, I finally got around to finishing my Guile port of SRFI 41:
https://github.com/cky/guile2-modules
Basically, both the code and the tests are based on the reference
implementation, albeit with somewhat significant
