On Tue 20 Oct 2009 10:08, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy: What about leaving both ‘eval-case’ and ‘eval-when’ for 2.0, and
> only deprecating ‘eval-case’ in the next stable series?
The problem is that eval-case has really murky semantics -- to me at
least. We've *never* needed to u
Hello!
Andy: What about leaving both ‘eval-case’ and ‘eval-when’ for 2.0, and
only deprecating ‘eval-case’ in the next stable series?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Wed 07 Oct 2009 22:27, Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> On a loosely related point, I notice that we have deprecated eval-case
>> in 1.9.x, in favour of eval-when. But 1.8.x only has eval-case; so
>> isn't the deprecation going to make it more difficult to handle code
>> that ha
On Wed 07 Oct 2009 22:27, Neil Jerram writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> It works pretty well, except for occurrences of ‘define-class’ et al.,
>> which lead to false positives because the code generated by these macros
>> doesn’t use ‘define’ (this is to make sure a top-level
On Wed 07 Oct 2009 23:53, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> Alternatively, should we add a suitable eval-when to the next 1.8.x
>> release, to help with this?
>
> That wouldn’t help much since it wouldn’t work with < 1.8.8.
You could have a local module in your program that provides eval-
Hi,
Neil Jerram writes:
> Are there deeper problems with compilation and define-class /
> module-define? E.g. is it possible that correct compilation of code
> following a define-class or module-define would be dependent on
> understanding the define-class/module-define properly?
No. For any
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> I just committed support for ‘-Wunbound-variable’:
>
>
> http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=f67ddf9dbfec851676806a2f3dff7eae539ac499
Looks great!
> It works pretty well, except for occurrences of ‘define-class’ et al.,
> which l
Hello,
I just committed support for ‘-Wunbound-variable’:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=f67ddf9dbfec851676806a2f3dff7eae539ac499
It works pretty well, except for occurrences of ‘define-class’ et al.,
which lead to false positives because the code generated by these macros
do
