Hi!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Fri 03 Jan 2020 19:30, Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> Should the #:re-export clause propagate the replace bit, or should
>> it not? :-)
>
> It is a good question :) Before, if you re-exported a #:replace
> binding, it wasn't possible to have it be exported wit
On Fri 03 Jan 2020 19:30, Ludovic Courtès writes:
> I’m not sure if this is an intended consequence of
> cf08dbdc189f0005cab6f2ec7b23ed9d150ec43d, so I thought I’d share this
> example of a practical effect:
>
> ludo@ribbon /tmp [env]$ cat x.scm
> (define-module (x)
> #:use-module (srfi srfi-1)
On 03.01.2020 19:30, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> Should the #:re-export clause propagate the replace bit, or should
> it not? :-)
The 2.9.8 release notes say one should use #:re-export-and-replace for
this use-case.
Happy new year!
Taylan
Hi again!
I’m not sure if this is an intended consequence of
cf08dbdc189f0005cab6f2ec7b23ed9d150ec43d, so I thought I’d share this
example of a practical effect:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
ludo@ribbon /tmp [env]$ cat x.scm
(define-module (x)
#:use-module (
