Re: uninterned symbols as Tree-IL constants

2011-08-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, BT Templeton skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Hi, >> >> BT Templeton skribis: >> >>> I noticed that when uninterned symbols are used as Tree-IL constants, >> >> I thought literal (constant) symbols in Elisp were interned. You seem >> to imply this isn’t always the cas

Re: uninterned symbols as Tree-IL constants

2011-08-21 Thread BT Templeton
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi, > > BT Templeton skribis: > >> I noticed that when uninterned symbols are used as Tree-IL constants, > > I thought literal (constant) symbols in Elisp were interned. You seem > to imply this isn’t always the case; can you explain? Since Elisp lacks h

Re: uninterned symbols as Tree-IL constants

2011-08-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, BT Templeton skribis: > I noticed that when uninterned symbols are used as Tree-IL constants, I thought literal (constant) symbols in Elisp were interned. You seem to imply this isn’t always the case; can you explain? Thanks, Ludo’.