Michael Tuexen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried the old version with --without-threads and it worked.
Ok!
> How can I try the new version? the guile-core-unstable.tar.gz
> is still the old version...
You can wait for the snapshots to catch up (should happen in a day or
so), or you can chec
Michael Tuexen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> eval.c:2658: error: `PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP'
> undeclared here (not in a function)
>
> Any idea, how to fix that? I'm trying to compile it on Mac OS X 10.3.9.
Hmm. PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP seems not to be portable
enough
Hallo,
I tried the old version with --without-threads and it worked.
How can I try the new version? the guile-core-unstable.tar.gz
is still the old version...
Best regards
Michael
On Oct 23, 2005, at 23:15 Uhr, Marius Vollmer wrote:
Michael Tuexen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I guess the mos
Michael Tuexen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I guess the most portable way to get recursive mutexes is to use
>> pthread_mutex_init together with pthread_mutexattr_settype with
>> PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE, which is defined in UNIX98.
>
> That sounds good. PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE is defined on my s
Hi Marius,
see my comments in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Oct 23, 2005, at 22:13 Uhr, Marius Vollmer wrote:
Michael Tuexen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
eval.c:2658: error: `PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP'
undeclared here (not in a function)
Any idea, how to fix that? I'm trying t
Michael Tuexen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to compile guile-1.7.2 on Mac OS X 10.3.9. The compilation
> breaks because scm_mutex_lock and scm_mutex_unlock are used in
> libguile/arbiters.c but the compiler and I can not find a definition
> of those functions. Where are they defined?
Hi Marius,
thanks, that works. It now stops at
eval.c:2658: error: `PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP' undeclared
here (not in a function)
Any idea, how to fix that? I'm trying to compile it on Mac OS X 10.3.9.
Best regards
Michael
On Oct 23, 2005, at 14:28 Uhr, Marius Vollmer wrote: